The Benghazi 9/11 Affair has not been highlighted by the old media. In fact the background General Petraeus story has allowed even less focus on the true sequence of events. President Obama has been allowed by the non-free press to avoid such basic questions as 1) Where were you before, during and after the attack?, 2) What were you doing before, during and after the attack and 3) Who were you consulting with before, during and after the attack?
The UN ambassador, Susan Rice, has also been allowed by the non-free press to avoid such basic questions as 1) Who told you to say that the attack was spontaneous and a result of a specific YouTube video?, 2) When were you asked to use the YouTube video as a reason for the attack and 3) When did the original YouTube story get dropped as the official reason for the attack, and who alerted you to a different cause? And a question for both: Who told you that the attack was due to a well-planned Islamic terrorist attack, and when did this become the official reason? The timeline for this tragedy is extremely important. The fact that the old media refuses to investigate this is telling, whereas the old media’s willingness to investigate thousands of emails pertaining to the Petraeus affair gives us a good idea of where their ideology falls.
2 thoughts on “Benghazi Affair”
Pingback: Benghazi II | Life, liberty & the non-pursuit of socialism…
Pingback: Benghazi Affair III « Life, liberty & the non-pursuit of socialism